The Dance of Genghis Chaim Review Essay Example

The Dance of Genghis Chaim Review Paper Essay on The Dance of Genghis Chaim The phenomenon of Nazism little to fix in an art form, it must be very clearly understood. The review in this sense is very contradictory. All the more meaningless to talk about the confrontation of peoples and cultures that is, sorry, complete nonsense. There are a number of the most remarkable of modern research (see. As S. Soloviev. Ethics killers.), Dedicated to the problem. And they say thats about it: It is not mindless obedience, but the conscious acceptance that characterized the German style of cooperation with evil so writes American historian Claudia Koontz (Conscience Nazis Ladomir 2007..). Of course, as said Mikhail Romm in the famous film, there was another Germany Those who actively resisted the Nazis, was a little, but they were It may seem strange, but the majority of Germans do not approve of Gross RACISM OR pogroms. Koontz shows that every time and in 1933, and prior to the approval of the Nuremberg Race Laws in 1935, and after the Kristallnacht in 1938 the Nazi regime after these bursts of violence faced with massive disapproval, which carefully studied and I worried on that score. Moreover, the aggressive propaganda simply does not bear fruit, even a high-ranking Nazi officials used the services of the Jews, not to mention ordinary citizens. Why is the whole population of the country were involved in the horrific crimes? Material incentives Germans mood constitutes an essential purpose of the board at each stage. The state has become a huge machine for pillage, and individuals in benefits pullers and bribed passively. Corrupting effect: were things, the existence of which they did not know at the disposal of the common people. occurred loyalty of millions of people passive mode more and was not required. Bribed the possibilities colonial existence in the East all of this was planned as a concrete utopia for everyone German. Nazi racial theory is rightly regarded as the ideological preparation and justification of hatred an d mass murder. (S. Madievsky,) It is quite another matter that the Nazi Intellectuals held conferences, created anti-Semitic institutions, about the definition of Jew arguing lawyers, biologists, physicians, philosophers. but it quickly became clear: to define the concept of race in Nazi terms can not be So much so that experts on racial matters does not recommend the Nazi leaders to use this concept No blood, no skull size or shape of the nose no specific signs of Jewishness has not been revealed, as, of course, the general public was not informed, but the propaganda effect was achieved. Antisemitism WAS SUPPORTED BY AUTHORITY OF ACADEMIC SCIENCE in a respectable form of racism turned back to normal, sanctified by the authority of science. taught German take a passive or an active part in the genocide. Many scientists who refused to be based on racism, forced out of the prestigious association, lost seats in the editorial board, but retained their positions and titles (p. 214). Most collaborated with the Nazis consciously and proactively. It is this complicity and a huge help of intellectuals in enforcing racist policies gave grounds Victor Klemperer, a miracle survivor of German philology of Jewish origin, to write: If the fate of the vanquished was in my hands, I would have released to the world of ordinary people, and even some of the leaders. .. but I would have hauled all the intellectuals, and professors would hang three feet higher than all the others (p. 238). But in post-war Germany, as we know, this category of Nazi war criminals escaped easiest.